Friday, 13 July 2018

Gudrun Burwitz obituary

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/past-six-days/2018-07-12/register/gudrun-burwitz-obituary-vnvl9xhlt

Daughter of Heinrich Himmler who kept a chilling diary during the war and later joined a secretive charity helping Nazi war criminals

Gudrun Himmler in Berlin in 1938 with her father
Gudrun Himmler in Berlin in 1938 with her father

In 1941 Gudrun, the 12-year-old daughter of Heinrich Himmler, began keeping a diary in which she idolised her father and wrote of her hopes for peace.
The next year, 500 miles away and hidden in a house in Amsterdam, Anne Frank, the same age as Gudrun, began keeping a diary with similar hopes. If peace came, wrote Gudrun, “we will certainly get a country estate in the east . . . Yes, if only peace came, but that will be a long time.” Anne wrote: “What’s the point of the war? Why, oh why can’t people live together peacefully? Why all this destruction?”
Long after the evils of Nazism had been exposed and its proponents brought to justice, Gudrun Burwitz continued to support veterans of the regime, keeping alight the flame of their barbarous ideology. Her father, who called her Püppi (little doll), had been the architect of the final solution in which Anne and millions of other people were systematically killed.
Unlike the children of other high-ranking Nazis, Burwitz, known as the Nazi Princess, never expressed horror at her father’s crimes. Instead, she became a key player in Stille Hilfe (Quiet Aid), a charity that brought succour to some of the Third Reich’s most notorious criminals. She would help them to start new lives, often with new identities. “It’s true I help where I can,” she said in 1998. “But I refuse to discuss my work.”

Thursday, 12 July 2018

The German retreat from the Marne, July-August 1918


The German retreat from the Marne, July-August 1918
This week's chapter examines the Germans in retreat, the capture of Oulchy-le-Chateau, German comment, American and British assistance, the Ourcq abandoned, Fere-en-Tardenois occupied, French reach the Crise, Soissons captured, retreat beyond the Vesle, Americans take Fismes, German withdrawals in Somme and Ancre areas, minor actions, fighting in the air, Marshal Foch's plans, Haig's offensive opens August 8, 1918, his dispositions, results of the first two days
A letter written by a man in a trench-mortar company, dated July 21, ran as follows: "You will be back in the thick of the mist now. Shirk it as much as you can; don't be stupid; we are risking our lives for the bigwigs. Our regiment is nearly wiped out, but we didn't push on very far. This war is becoming the greatest massacre that ever was. What is going to happen I don't know. Germany is slowly crumbling to pieces."

Monday, 9 July 2018

This Week in History - The Battle of Britain (10 July)

https://ospreypublishing.com/thisweekhistory/



An extract from Aircraft of the Aces 18: Hurricane Aces 1939-40 celebrates the majority of the legendary ‘few’ and the Hawker Hurricane, the Royal Air force’s first monoplane fighter, the backbone of the desperate British defence against the Luftwaffe. In this extract two aces describe the bold but effective tactic they favoured for dealing with large bomber formations – 

Head on attacks
A great proponent of this method of attack was Flt Lt ‘Pete’ Brothers who, whilst serving as a flight commander firstly with No 32 Sqn and then No 257 Sqn, scored ten kills during the Battle of Britain;

‘The urgent thing was to get at the bombers before they dropped their bombs, and if you were short of the height you wanted to carry out a stern or beam attack, the best thing was to take them head-on and go straight through the formation. I always dived underneath the bombers short of impact because I always thought that the instinctive thing for pilots to do was pull up rather than push down when faced with collision, and the last thing I wanted was to meet a Dorner or Heinkel at close quarters. This manoeuvre also produced additional speed, thus enabling me to pull the Hurricane around once clear of the bombers and turn back into them again for a more conventional stern attack.

‘Head on shots were the easiest of the lot to perform because there was no deflection needed whatsoever. I would press home the attack until I thought a collision was almost inevitable. In many respects this was the best from of attack, as most bombers had less protection from both guns and armour at the front. It was often very difficult to confirm whether you had inflicted mortal damage to an aircraft after a single pass, however, as once you had turned back into the bombers the formation had often scattered in response to your initial assault. With a stern attack you would usually look to set an engine on fire, thus denoting some success for your endeavours.’ 

Another great proponent of the head-on attack was No 253 Sqn’s OC, Sqn Ldr G R ‘Gerry’ Edge, who had earlier perfected his technique with No 605 Sqn over the Dunkirk beaches whilst achieving ace status. Indeed, he got so proficient at tackling bombers as the summer months wore on that of the 11 kills (added to his 71/2 over France) he claimed between 7 and 15 September, no less than five of these were Ju 88s (four claimed on 9 September alone), four He 111s and one a solitary Do 17. In the following passage, he describes the intricacies of his favoured method of attack; 

‘If you left it till your last hundred yards to creak away from a head-on attack, you were in trouble. With practice, you got to judge when to break. But once you knew how, a head-on attack was a piece of cake. When you opened fire, you’d kill or badly wound the pilot and the second pilot. Then you’d rake the line of them as you broke away. On one attack, the first Heinkel I hit crashed into the next Heinkel. There was a lot of crashing between the bombers we attacked head-on.’

Thursday, 5 July 2018

100 Years Ago



https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/king-at-baseball-match-krzfp3llt


King at baseball match

Yesterday’s baseball match on the Chelsea Football Ground was an awakener for London, a revelation of America at play. The afternoon was as strenuous as a pillow-fight in a boys’ dormitory, and took us away to those distant times when we could rejoice under a blue sky without looking for Zeppelins and Gothas.
The afternoon passed in such a pandemonium as was perhaps never heard before on an English playing-field; not even on a football ground. The United States seemed to be shouting in chorus and Great Britain joined in. Never, moreover, was a football ground so arrayed. The dingy surroundings were shut out by a square mile or two of flags, “Old Glory” and the Union Jack predominating. The grandstand was gorgeously draped, and the King and Queen went to their seats by a flowery way. Both for distinction and for enthusiasm the gathering was without precedent in baseball, or rather “the ball game,” as the more knowing spectators were careful to call it. The Army players wore green with blue caps, the Navy blue trimmed with red. They assembled before the Royal box, and the King, descending among them, shook hands with the captains.
Baseball is one of the fastest and most exciting methods of getting breathless ever invented. It calls for great skill, and its rewards are salaries beyond the dreams of avarice. The dignity of cricket it disowns; the tremulous tumult of football is as the recreation of well-mannered mice by comparison. The players think by lightning and field, catch, and throw with the certainty of a stopwatch. As if the chaff of the spectators were not sufficient for them, they chivy one another. The catcher is padded like an armchair, and must be able to take punishment with the calm of a prize-fighter.
We should not care to say which was the better side because, frankly, we do not know. But the Navy won by two to one and appeared to deserve its victory. Naval officers rubbed shoulders with Army officers, the uniforms of the United States with those of the United Kingdom. The Stars and Stripes was waved by every man, woman, and child; and there could be no doubt of a whole-hearted acceptance of America as a comrade in play and a near relation in the great work that lies before the two big English-speaking families.

Influenza epidemic spreading

The influenza epidemic shows no sign of abatement and in many large towns schools have been closed and business is seriously hampered. The Irish Registrar-General reported five deaths due to influenza in Dublin last week. There have also been fatal cases in London. In Birmingham and district the doctors are at their wits’ end to know how to deal with the number of patients. One found 178 waiting for him when he arrived at his surgery. Last week there were 10 deaths in the city traceable to the disease. Many teachers and hundreds of children are away from school. The munition factories and ironworks are seriously affected. Numbers of men and women have had to be sent home in ambulances owing to the suddenness of the seizure. The doctors’ surgeries in Manchester are not only crowded, but queues have to be controlled outside dispensing centres. Schools have been closed, and large business firms are severely handicapped. The authorities agree that the present disease resembles a form of West Indian fever known as “deugnes”. Sixty tramway-car drivers and guards are off duty, and at the sheds absentees number 200. A prisoner at the assizes could not be tried for bigamy because he was suffering from influenza. There are many victims in Newcastle, on Tyneside, and in Northumberland. Several of the city policemen and firemen have been overcome, and a few persons have collapsed in the streets. Numbers of nurses and medical students are affected. In the surrounding country the epidemic is equally severe. Coalminers especially have been attacked. One colliery had 18 underground lads “off” in a single day. The Nottinghamshire collieries have had similar experiences. In a pit at Mansfield 250 men were out one day, and the hosiery and boot factories have lost many of their women workers. One of the biggest mills has had to close and several deaths are reported. The epidemic is spreading in Surrey, particularly in the Egham and Woking areas.
At an inquest at Deptford on two boys of 10 years of age the doctor said that the evidence pointed to influenza being the cause of death. He expressed the opinion that germs entered by the mouth and nose. To rinse the mouth and nostrils every morning with a tepid solution of salt and water was a good safeguard.

Second Battle of the Marne, July 1918


Second Battle of the Marne, July 1918
This week's chapter examines the minor operations at the end of June, Americans and Australians, success of the tanks, the strategic situation, Germans attack east and west of Reims, July 15, complete failure in east, Germans cross the Marne, end of German advance, July 17, German comment, July 18, Foch strikes between Soissons and the Marne, great allied success, the German retreat continues, fighting in the air, raids into Germany, operations on other sectors, the turn of the tide
The Germans experienced great difficulty in retiring across the river. The temporary bridges which they constructed were constantly shot away, and the troops on the left bank of the river had nothing but mountain artillery to support them, for the wheeled guns had been unable to cross to help them


 

The new German offensive
July 16, 1918
Mr Bonar Law was able to tell the House of Commons last night that the general effect of the offensive east of Reims was that "the enemy have been very, heavily repulsed, have suffered severe losses, and have received a complete check"
  Contrary to the expectation of some of the prophets, the enemy have delivered the first great blow of their long-expected offensive against the French, and not against the British. They have advanced to the assault on a front of about fifty-five miles east and west of Reims, and their right wing is operating on the line of the Marne. It is not to be supposed that the offensive which began yesterday discloses the whole of the German plans. The enemy are known to be prepared for battle in several other sectors, and when issue has been fully joined on the front first selected we shall probably see further developments elsewhere. But, whatever form it may ultimately assume, this is unquestionably the outset of Germany’s supreme effort during the present campaigning season.
The details so far received are scanty, as is always the case on the first day, and the precise object of the German Higher Command is still a matter for speculation. Their attack is split into two halves by the city of Reims, around which there is a “dead sector” of several miles, perhaps because the defences of Reims remain extremely formidable. Looking at the battle from the French side, the right of the attack extends from the village of Prunay, east of Reims, to the group of low hills known as the Main de Massiges, a few miles west of the Argonne Forest, amid the rolling uplands of Champagne. The left of the attack extends from the village of Fossoy, south of the Marne and east of Chateau-Thierry, to Coulommes, a village some miles to the south-west of Reims. There was also some heavy and apparently isolated fighting with the American troops which hold the village of Vaux, west of Chateau-Thierry.
All the reports concur in declaring that the German operation constituted no surprise. A movement in this area had been confidently expected for some days - indeed, the French are said to have predicted it almost to the hour - and the Allied Higher Command were fully prepared for the enemy’s advance. The attack was preceded by a violent bombardment, which began at midnight and was so intense that it roused the people of Paris. There was also a great deal of shelling of towns far behind the Allied line, including La Ferte-sous-Jouarre, on the Marne, and Montmirail and Chalons. Curiously enough, Reims does not appear to have been shelled at all, nor was there any noticeable bombardment in the “dead sector” on each side of the city.
The enemy advanced to the assault in the chosen areas a little before 4.30am. In the sector east of Reims they made comparatively little progress all day. Our gallant French Allies held up the German infantry along the whole of this portion of the front, and only three points were seriously threatened. The first was at the village of Prunay, which the enemy seem at one time to have captured; it was only half a mile behind the French front line. The second was at Prosnes, where the Germans gained some ground; and the third was on the road from Somme Py to Souain, where the assailants also won a local success. But Mr Bonar Law was able to tell the House of Commons last night that the general effect of the offensive east of Reims was that “the enemy have been very, heavily repulsed, have suffered severe losses, and have received a complete check.” The French leaders express themselves as highly satisfied, and, should the situation remain as described they will have every possible reason for their gratification.
The Germans fared rather better in their operations west of Reims, and if they have Paris in view it is quite possible that their principal strength was concentrated on this side. The battle extended for ten or a dozen miles along the banks of the Marne, from a point near Chateau-Thierry to Verneuil. Thence the battle line swerved north-eastward away from the river to Coulommes, which marked the limit of active hostilities west of Reims. The total length of the line of attack in this region was between twenty and twenty-three miles, and the progress of the Germans seems to have been curiously unequal. Towards Reims they penetrated as far south as the village of Belval, which brought them within seven miles of the town of Epernay, one of the principal centres of the champagne trade. They crossed the Marne at two or three points, and it must be borne in mind that the southern bank of the river is less easy to defend than the northern.
The vine-clad hills in this neighbourhood are mostly on the northern side. From Verneuil the Germans made the passage of the river and reached Comblizy, and farther west they crossed at Dormans and got as far as the village of Chezy. In each instance these advances represent a thrust about three miles in depth. American troops were holding the extreme left of the battle line, at Fossoy and on the banks of the Surmelin, a small tributary of the Marne. Here, again, the Germans crossed the river, but according to the latest available information they did not get very far beyond the southern bank.
The conflict between Germans and Americans west of Fossoy seems to have been distinguished by a brilliant counter-attack, in which the Americans took a thousand prisoners - a splendid omen, which was received with immense enthusiasm when it was announced in the House of Commons. It is understood that no British troops participated in the operations, so far as is known. The intermingling of British and French troops, which was only a temporary expedient due to a special emergency, has ceased.
The British troops in the Marne area have gone north, and the French units which fought so valiantly in the Ypres sector have rejoined the main French forces. One prevalent theory is that the German Higher Command is endeavouring to encircle Reims and to gain control of the spacious wooded heights known as the Montagne de Reims well to the south of the city, by outflanking them. In his dispatch published to-day our Special Correspondent with the French Armies expresses the view that the Montagne de Reims, which he has examined, is so formidably held that the enemy have small prospect of taking it by any device. Until they capture these heights they have little chance of moving with safety towards the open country round Chalons.
Our Correspondent thinks the principal attack is being made west of Reims, and that the object of the enemy is to form a wider front with a view to an advance towards Paris. With this view we are inclined to concur, but we are convinced as ever that General Foch will be able to counter the menace effectively.

Wednesday, 4 July 2018

First World War: the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, as it happened

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-one/10930863/First-World-War-centenary-the-assassination-of-Franz-Ferdinand-as-it-happened.html

First World War centenary: the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, as it happened



On Sunday June 28 1914 in Sarajevo, Gavrilo Princip fired the shot that killed
the Archduke and started the train of events that led to global war. Here is
a step by step account of how the dramatic day unfolded



Murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand Telegraph headline



The Daily Telegraph, June 29 1914

Somme - 102 Years Ago








somme3.jpg