Thursday, 29 March 2018

100 Years Ago

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/250-000-rounds-from-the-air-jgpscptz6


250,000 rounds from the air

Telegraphic dispatch from General Headquarters, France, March 28, 9.50pm: On the 27th inst low-flying was again carried out by large bodies of our aeroplanes, while our infantry machines continued reporting the position of our battle line. Over 30 tons of bombs were dropped, and a quarter of a million rounds of ammunition fired from a height that ensured accuracy on different targets. Severe casualties are known to have been inflicted on the enemy, and the bringing up of his troops and ammunition was delayed. Twenty-four German machines were brought down in air fighting, and seven others were driven down out of control. Two hostile observation balloons were also destroyed. Nineteen of our machines are at present missing, but a proportion of these are believed to have landed on our side of the line. Very heavy fire directed against our machines from the ground accounted for the greater portion of our casualties. During the night the bombing of Bapaume, Bray, and Peronne was continued with the utmost vigour. Over a thousand bombs were dropped, and thousands of rounds of ammunition were fired at targets which were plentiful and easy to see in the moonlight. Our pilots saw their bombs bursting in the middle of columns of troops and transport and on encampments. Four of the aeroplanes are missing. On the 27th inst the Sablon station at Metz was bombed. Well over a ton of bombs were dropped; good bursts were seen on the sidings and beside the railway. On the 28th instant our machines carried out a successful raid on the station at Luxemburg. Twenty-one heavy bombs were dropped, and several were seen to burst on the objectives. All our machines returned from both raids.
● Poison gas factory bombed French Air report, March 23-26: Our infantry aeroplanes, bombing and chasing crews, photographers and observers, distinguished themselves by their courage and endurance, both by day and night. Descending sometimes to a height of 60ft from the ground, our pilots attacked enemy contingents with their machine-guns and fired thousands of cartridges. On the night of March 23-24 one of our squadrons dropped 31 tons of explosives on the Badische Anilin factory of Ludwigshafen, the chief German factory for the production of poison gas.

The British Army in France, Aug 1914-Dec 1917


LORD FRENCH REVIEWING THE VOLUNTEER TRAINING CORPS;· June 17, 1916:

The corps consisted of men above military age, or exempted for other 'reasons ·from active service,

who voluntarily placed themselves at the disposal of the military authorities for purposes of  home




defence.

IN THE SOMME BATTLE : THE ATTACK, UNDER HEAVY BOMBARDMENT, ON THE SCHWABEN REDOUBT,

OCTOBER 12, 1916.


THE WAY UP TO PASSCHENDAELE RIDGE, AND SOME OF THE GERMAN




DEFENCES.

TRENCH WARFARE: . ROUTING GERMANS FROM DUG-OUTS.


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-battle-of-the-marne-vmj29c66q?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=newsletter_118&utm_medium=email&utm_content=118_28.03.2018%20Army%20(1)&CMP=TNLEmail_118918_3097035_118


The Battle of the Marne

The action of General Foch, who was handling the French centre, contributed greatly to the Allied victory
Today is by common consent regarded as the third anniversary of the battle of the Marne, which must always be one of the great landmarks in human history. In that mighty conflict civilization was saved, and German aspirations for the domination of the world were irretrievably shattered. The Marne decided the subsequent course of the war, for it stemmed the tide of invasion in the West, and imposed upon the Germans a defensive attitude which they have never since been able to change.
It is not surprising that the true facts about the Marne have been successfully disguised from the German nation, and that large numbers of Germans are still unaware of the irrevocable outcome of the encounter. Their rulers remain unwilling to let them know that from the moment issue was joined on the Marne it became clear that, whatever happened afterwards, Germany could not possibly win the war. The interest of France centres to a great extent upon the triumph of Verdun, but we think that when a true perspective is restored it will be seen that the Marne must always be France’s greatest glory. Caught unprepared, hurled back ruthlessly from their own frontier, unaided save by the small British Army, the troops of France won deathless fame by defeating the hosts which for forty years had been making ready for that great day.
The fullness of the achievement of the Army of France is revealed only as it recedes, and as we are able gradually to measure all the consequences which flowed from it. September 6 is chosen as the anniversary, for upon the morning of that day Marshal Joffre struck with his full force. As a matter of fact, the battle hung in the balance until the evening of September 9, when the order for the German retreat was issued.
The movements which led to the battle really began on September 3, when General von Kluck and the German First Army changed front before Paris. Von Kluck, as we now know, had lost touch with the Second Army on his left. He swerved south-eastward and crossed the Marne, leaving a single Reserve Corps to guard his flank on the line of the Ourcq. The German General Staff thought he could disregard the British Army on the left of the Allied line, and evidently believed it to be out of action. His object was to envelop the French flank and roll up the French armies eastward while the rest of the German forces fell upon their front, Paris and the British could afterwards be gobbled up at leisure. We know the sequel. Neglected by the German calculations, the French Sixth Army was forming afresh on Paris. Directed by the rapid foresight of General Gallieni, led brilliantly by General Maunoury, the Sixth Army swept upon the Ourcq, where the battle actually began on the afternoon of September 5. Von Kluck skilfully recrossed the Marne when he realized his danger, but the German plans were by that time dislocated, for at dawn on September 6 Marshal Joffre had set his entire line in motion. The action of General Foch, who was handling the French centre, contributed greatly to the Allied victory, as did also the remarkable battle of the Grand Couronne de Nancy, fought by General Castelnau, which was still in progress.
The British Army played an important, prompt, and honourable part in the battle of the Marne. but its supreme achievement came less than two months afterwards at the first battle of Ypres. The Marne broke the Kaiser’s aims, and the first battle of Ypres sealed his doom. He poured out his hordes against our thin lines in the vain hope of reaching the Channel ports. On one black day he all but succeeded, and had not the heroes of our old Army died in their tracks the result of the Marne might have been undone. Ypres was the complement and the seal of the Marne.

Monday, 26 March 2018

Museo del Regio Esercito in Italia dal 1848 al 1946 (2)


Друга половина 19 століття, починаючи від гагрібальдійських "червоних сорочок"


Museo del Regio Esercito in Italia dal 1848 al 1946 (3)


Початок 20 століття (напередодні Першої світової війни)


Museo del Regio Esercito in Italia dal 1848 al 1946 (7)


Друга світова війна


Museo del Regio Esercito in Italia dal 1848 al 1946 (8)


Зал, присвячений останньому королю Італії


Museo del Regio Esercito in Italia dal 1848 al 1946 (9)


Piedmontese Army through the ages


Charles Saatchi's Great Masterpieces: Why Francisco de Zurbarán is the most overlooked great master

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/what-to-see/charles-saatchis-great-masterpieces-francisco-de-zurbaran-overlooked/


Martyrdom of St Serapion, 1628, by Francisco de Zurbaran
Martyrdom of St Serapion, 1628, by Francisco de Zurbaran

Francisco de Zurbarán (1598-1664) is the most overlooked of the great masters. Outside Spain he is barely known, and generally neglected. Why? Primarily, because he specialised in painting monks. In fact, virtually all of his pictures were ecclesiastical, produced for monasteries and populated by clergy, saints, and other religious figures. The paintings simply lack the overwhelming impact of masterpieces by the Spanish titans: Velásquez, Goya, and El Greco.
The dark mysticism of Zurbarán’s work was appealing during a time of great religious conflict. In artistic terms, this meant dispensing with the extravagances of baroque and mannerism. They were considered too much of the flesh, full of sensuality, nudity, lust, and depicting Old Testament fables rather than New Testament truths. 

Thursday, 22 March 2018

100 Years Ago - Luddendorf's Offensive

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/the-offensive-begun-h56mgbhjd


The offensive begun

At about 5 o’clock this morning the enemy artillery swelled into a heavy bombardment of practically the whole British front south of the Scarpe, and an hour later opened fire with gas shells on the front south of Armentieres. As I write, at 10 o’clock, the air is thunderous. Our guns are replying strenuously. Thus far no infantry movement is reported. The weather is very hazy and aerial observation is almost impossible. Today is one of the dates mentioned by prisoners for the opening of the great offensive. Our troops are everywhere standing to in readiness.
The following little story is worth telling as illustrating the spirit of our men. In a recent night raid against our posts, two parties of Germans, 20 strong, and another 30 strong, came over disguised with spectacular frightfulness. They wore hideous masks, black shirts and overalls, and each man carried a great dagger and an automatic pistol. The garrisons of the attacked posts put up a sturdy defence, and the raiders were compelled to retire. They took with them one of our men, whom they had captured, and who was escorted by a burly German with pistol and dagger. Presently, however, on getting separated from the main body, the British prisoner quietly raised his hand to the brim of his shrapnel helmet and then, snatching it from off his head, brought its sharp edge down with such a tremendous crack upon his captor’s skull that the latter collapsed like a log. In telling the story to his cheering comrades shortly afterwards the stout fellow maintained that he had killed the German, but, whether this was actually so or not, he undoubtedly “did him in” effectively enough to make good his escape.
Later: Following the heavy bombardment which commenced against almost the whole of our front south of the Scarpe this morning, the enemy launched an infantry attack on a big scale. Under cover of a smoke barrage, his infantry came over in dense waves on a front extending from the north of Lagnicourt down to Gauche Wood. At 10.50am there was hand-to-hand fighting in our front line at various points. Details coming back from the battle line are scrappy, but it seems certain that the Germans have assumed the offensive on a big scale.

100 Years Ago - German Spring Offensive

 British artillery under German gas-shell fire




MACHINE GUN CORPS IN RESERVE IN A WOOD





BRITISH TROOPS MARCHING UP IN SUPPORT
"WALKING WOUNDED" LEAVING A CASUALTY STATION


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-great-attack-8vw5d566h?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=newsletter_118&utm_medium=email&utm_content=118_21.03.2018%20Offensive%20(1)&CMP=TNLEmail_118918_3068743_118


The great attack

The opening phases of the conflict have been fierce beyond all precedent. It is now established that no fewer than forty German divisions took part in the opening attack, and it is clear that the losses on both sides are proportionately heavy


Half a million Germans attacked the British Army on Thursday morning on a front of sixty miles, and so began the greatest and most critical battle of the war. If Germany fails to achieve her purpose now, as we believe assuredly she will, her doom is sealed in spite of all her glittering successes m Eastern Europe. The British Army, already tried in this war in a hundred fierce conflicts, is battling today for the safety and the liberty of these islands and of Western civilization. Upon our own brave soldiers this signal and supreme struggle has been thrust, and we believe with the Prime Minister, who spoke some straight and burning words to a deputation of miners on Thursday afternoon, that every nerve will be strained in this country to back them in their gallant stand.
There is assuredly no room for slackness or bickering at such a moment. In its initial stages, the German offensive contained no surprise. Our Army was not caught unawares. Nothing in the war has been more remarkable than the unerring accuracy with which our Intelligence has lately divined the intentions of the enemy. The points of attack were fully foreseen. The actual date was known. In the last three months our main defensive positions have been enormously strengthened, and the onslaught was awaited with the firmest confidence.
Broadly speaking, the attack of the enemy has been made on a front extending from a point near Arras to the fortress of La Fere, or from the Scarpe to the Oise. It is an odd commentary upon German strategy that Marshal von Hindenburg is striving to recover ground which he incontinently abandoned a year ago. So far as can be gathered from the limited details available, the pressure is at present greatest in the country west of Cambrai and at points south-west of St Quentin. Probably the area between Arras and Cambrai is the scene of the enemy’s principal thrust, and two reasons explain their selection of this locality. The first is that the undulating lands between the Scarpe and the Canal du Nord usually recover from the effect of winter some weeks earlier than the districts on the Franco-Belgian frontier. The second is that, having rallied after a very severe blow before Cambrai last November, the Germans may have felt encouraged to try again in the same neighbourhood.
The opening phases of the conflict have been fierce beyond all precedent. It is now established that no fewer than forty German divisions took part in the opening attack, and it is clear that the losses on both sides are proportionately heavy. Telegraphing last night, at the end of the second day’s fighting, Sir Douglas Haig notes a series of exceptionally fine defences - naming especially the 24th, the 3rd, and the 51st Divisions - in a record of universal gallantry. The enemy has made progress at certain points, and we infer, though few geographical points are given, that his main successes have been north-west of the Havrincourt Wood and south of St Quentin. Some such dents in the line were anticipated, for in every offensive delivered by either side, with the single exception of the battle of Festubert, which failed through lack of shells, some ground has been von by the attacking force at the outset.
Meanwhile the Germans are piling up fresh divisions against our forces; further fighting of “the most severe nature” is anticipated; and they may well win further successes before they are exhausted. They are hailing it already as a duel to the death; but our men are inspired by the same unconquerable spirit which barred the road at Ypres, and we wait the result, which may still be distant, with absolute confidence in the prowess of the British Army.
Many people, including some very shrewd judges of military problems, are still wondering even today why the enemy are butting their heads against the formidable Allied positions in the West after their unforgettable experience at Verdun. It is worth while to answer this question. We must dismiss from our minds the stories that the German forces in the front line have undergone any great deterioration. They are not all of the same quality as two years ago, but every army in the field has probably lost a little of its original zest and efficiency. Again, it must be clearly recognized that this is no sham attack. The Germans mean business. It is too soon to conclude, on the other hand, that the assault on the Cambrai front represents the main ultimate feature of their offensive. Their natural endeavour would be to attract all possible reinforcements and reserves to a particular point, and then to attack suddenly elsewhere.
We may be quite certain that the element of surprise has not yet been eliminated from the new battle in the West. But when we turn to the larger reasons which have probably moved the enemy, there is ground for much encouragement. They are attacking, in the first place, because they believe that they have accumulated a dominating preponderance of strength, particularly in men, though possibly not in guns. They have drawn large forces from the Eastern front; they are said to have transported a number of Austrian batteries to France; there is even unconfirmed talk of the presence of some Bulgarian units. In other words, they are striking in the West because they believe that this time they can win a victory that will end the war. On any other assumption the new offensive is sheer folly, and the German military leaders, though they make many political mistakes, are not apt to commit fundamental military blunders. Our own conviction is that they have nevertheless made a gross miscalculation of the Allied defensive strength, and that they have no more chance of a military triumph than they have ever had since the Marne. The other half of the explanation is that, look at it how we will, Germany cannot afford to wait any longer. She cannot hope to digest her extensive conquests in Eastern Europe while three solid, undefeated armies confront her in the West, and while another gigantic army from across the Atlantic is steadily being transported to Europe. She must attack, if at all, before the United States Army comes fully into line. Her own people, though elated by the collapse of Russia and the encirclement of Rumania, have still been looking nervously towards the tremendous Allied forces in the West. They are on very short commons, their staying power has been badly strained, and they cannot expect much food from Russia until next year.
Germany, in short, has evidently resolved to stake all her chances on a terrific onslaught in the West this spring. She has committed herself to the greatest gamble in history. We believe that she will fail, and it is precisely because failure in the present attack must react disastrously upon Germany that we derive encouragement from the military position as it is disclosed today. All the grain of the Ukraine, all the iron of the Donetz basin, all the oil in Batum and Ploesti, will bring no consolation to the underfed civil population of Germany if their last legions are shattered to pieces against the unbreakable wall in the West. They will know then, if they never knew before, that, come what may, they can never hope to win.

Monday, 19 March 2018

This Week in History - Treaty of Paris (30 March)

https://ospreypublishing.com/thisweekhistory/


Rosyjski port wojenny w Sewastopolu ok. 1850 r.


Cesarz Francuzów Napoleon III odwiedza w Calais flotę brytyjską szykującą się do rejsu na Morze Czarne, litografia z epoki
Brytyjska eskadra ostrzeliwuje rosyjską twierdzę Bomersund na Wyspach Alandzkich w sierpniu 1854 r., litografia z epoki
Car Mikołaj I w mundurze galowym

Cesarz Francuzów Napoleon III, mal. Franz Xaver Winterhalter
Królowa Wielkiej Brytanii Wiktoria, portret z 1837 r.
Fotograf Roger Fenton na wozie mieszczącym laboratorium fotograficzne, Krym, 1855 r.
Brytyjscy dragoni i francuscy żuawi w obozie pod Sewastopolem

Brytyjscy oficerowie na Krymie w 1854 r.

Oblężenie Sewastopola – brytyjscy artylerzyści wciągają na stanowisko działo 32-funtowe
Admirał Paweł Nachimow, jeden z dowódców obrony Sewastopola
Ks. Aleksander Mienszykow, dowódca wojsk rosyjskich na Krymie
Artyleria sprzymierzonych bombarduje Sewastopol 1854 r., litografia francuska z epoki

Okręty sprzymierzonych kotwiczą w zatoce pod Bałakławą 1855 r.
Florence Nightingale, fotografia z lat 60. XIX w.
Pielęgniarka opatruje rannego podczas walk pod Sewastopolem w 1855 r.
Florence Nightingale w szpitalu w Scutari, litografia z 1856 r.
Francuska artyleria podczas bitwy nad Almą, rycina z epoki
Oficer 11. pułku huzarów księcia Alberta z Lekkiej Brygady uzbrojony w szablę kawaleryjską wz. 1854
Marynarze walczyli jak zwykła piechota, artylerzyści wznosili także polowe fortyfikacje
Widok Sewastopola, głównej bazy rosyjskiej Floty Czarnomorskiej, 1848 r
Obóz wojsk sprzymierzonych na Krymie, zima 1854 r., rys. C.L. Doughty, XX w.
Flota Czarnomorska na redzie Teodozji, mal. Iwan Ajwazowski, 1850 r.

Bitwa pod Synopą, 30 listopada 1853 r. – rosyjskie okręty liniowe ostrzeliwują eskadrę turecką, mal. Iwan Ajwazowski
Rosyjska twierdza Kale w Gruzji płonie po ostrzale okrętów sprzymierzonych, litografia włoska z epoki
Bitwa pod Synopą, mal. Andriej Bogomołow 
Jeszcze jeden obraz bitwy pod Synopą, mal. Iwan Ajwazowski, 1853 r.
Brytyjska flota wypływa ze Spithead na Bałtyk, mal. William Melby, 1854 r.
Sewastopol ostrzeliwany przez sprzymierzonych, rycina francuska, 1855 r.
Bitwa pod Bałakławą, 25 października 1854 r., litografia według rysunku Williama Simpsona
Oddziały tureckie lądują w Eupatorii na Krymie, rycina francuska, 1854 r
Brytyjska lekka brygada szarżuje na rosyjską baterię pod Bałakławą, mal. Richard Caton Woodville, 1897 r.
Okręty sprzymierzonych ostrzeliwują rosyjskie pozycje na Krymie, litografia z epoki
Wyładunek amunicji dla wojsk sprzymierzonych w porcie Bałakława
Rosjanie podpalają budynki przed opuszczeniem Sewastopola
Car Aleksander II i oficerowie lejbgwardii
Rosyjscy artylerzyści na szańcach Sewastopola, litografia z epoki
Flota francuska przepływa przez cieśninę Bosfor w 1855 r., rycina z epoki
Rozbita rosyjska bateria w Sewastopolu
Tureckie okręty liniowe z połowy XIX w
Brytyjski medal za wojnę krymską (awers)
Brytyjski medal za wojnę krymską (rewers)



In 1853, Russia drew the Ottoman Empire into a war on a superficial pretext: the Ottomans had granted Catholic France, rather than Orthodox Russia, the right to protect Ottoman controlled Christian sites in Jerusalem. The Russians claimed this was a provocation of war by the Ottomans – however their true intentions were to claim Ottoman territory.

Anxious to annex territories in Eastern Europe, particularly the provinces of Moldavia and Walachia (now in modern day Romania), Russian troops found themselves near the banks of the Black Sea, occupying parts of the Ottoman Empire. The Turks officially declared war. On 28 March 1854, looking to prevent Russian expansion, and in order to protect their lucrative trade interests in the region, Britain and France (with Austrian backing) also declared war on Russia.

The Crimean War lasted until 1856 and took place mainly on the Crimean peninsula in the Black Sea. The war became infamous for military and logistical incompetence, epitomised by the Charge of the Light Brigade, but was one of the first conflicts to introduce tactical use of railways.


In September 1854, Allied troops invaded the Crimea, having overcome an outbreak of cholera that took a particularly heavy toll on French troops, hampering their preparations for the attack. Within a month, however, French and British troops were besieging the Russian held city of Sebastopol. The siege was to last for a year.

On 25 October 1854, the Russians were driven back at the Battle of Balaclava, despite the foolhardy Charge of the Light Brigade. Eleven days later, the Battle of Inkerman was also fought with high casualties on both sides.

Notably, a violent storm on the night of 14 November 1854 wrecked nearly thirty allied vessels carrying a precious cargo of medical supplies, food and clothing. There followed a desperate winter, pitifully short of supplies, where wounded soldiers lay hungry and gravely in need of medical assistance. This ill-treatment was reported by war correspondents for newspapers from Europe to America. It prompted the work of Florence Nightingale, and led eventually to the introduction of modern nursing methods, but did little to help at the time.

British and French troops suffered immense casualties before a peace treaty was finally written. Over 111,000 British men reached the Crimea of whom, official figures state, 21,097 men died in the theatre of war and 16,323 succumbed to disease, figures that do not include those who died after returning home. The French sent out over 300,000 men of whom 30,240 were killed in action or from wounds, and possibly a further 75,000 died of disease

The French and British finally forced the fall of Sebastopol on 11 September 1855 and peace was subsequently concluded at Paris on 30 March 1856.


The final stages leading to the Treaty of Paris are described here in an extract from Essential Histories 2: The Crimean War 1854-1856
Apart from occasional, ritual exchanges of fire from batteries facing one another across the bay and occasional skirmishes in the Baidar Valley around Sevastopol, 1855 came to an inauspicious close. An enormous explosion in the French lines on 15 November, which killed 80 and wounded almost 300, resulted from mishandling of ammunition not enemy action.

In the opening weeks of 1856, typhus and cholera struck once more, especially among the French, who suffered over 50,000 cases, of which one-fifth died. Paymaster Dixon recorded in January: ‘The French are dreadfully badly off, much worse than last winter, they are dropping off in scores, nay hundreds.’ The British now had an abundance, and in some instances a surplus, of clothing and huts, and as the weather improved they began organising drag hunts and race meetings. Regimental theatres put on plays and a range of speakers delivered educational lectures, too. Militarily, the allies undertook musketry training and field exercises. But it all lacked purpose. In Dixon’s words, ‘road making here and I suppose diplomacy at home have taken its [fighting’s] place’. Soldiers and sailors were marking time until the small print of peace could be fashioned into an acceptable document. French fantasies about attacking Russia’s Polish provinces through Germany and British dreams of reducing Kronstadt and Helsignfors (Helsinki) in the Baltic provided the unrealistic backdrop for negotiation.

Almost throughout the entire war, fitful attempts at securing peace had been going on in Vienna, but during the autumn of 1855 clandestine bilateral contacts were also established between Paris and St Petersburg. Discovery of these prompted Austria to take the initiative. On 16 December 1855, Count Esterhazy led a mission to St Petersburg, which conveyed conditions for peace: confirmation of autonomy for Moldavia and Wallachia; freedom of navigation for all nations on the Danube; neutralisation of the Black Sea, with abolition of military installations on its shores; guarantee of the rights of all Christian subjects in Turkey. A fifth condition, allegedly added on British insistence, provided for further matters to be raised during subsequent talks ‘in the interest of lasting peace’. The Holy Places in Jerusalem, the Bosphorus and Dardanelles Straits or Sevastopol were not highlighted. In that respect, the Tsar would not be humiliated. However, if Russia did not accept the submission by 18 January, Austria threatened war.

Despite some reluctance and opposition among his ministers, two days before the deadline Alexander II accepted these terms. Count D. N. Bludov recalled Louis XIV’s resignation at the conclusion of the Seven Years War in 1763: ‘If we no longer have the means to make war, then let us make peace.’ The news reached Sevastopol eight days later. There was still time for forces on both sides to make military points. On 29 January, Russian guns in Sevastopol’s northern suburb let loose a vast cannonade against the Karabel and on 4 February the French destroyed Fort Nicholas. Honour seemed to be satisfied. Hostilities petered out.

The peace conference gathered in Paris on 25 February 1856, and three days later an armistice lasting until 31 March was signed. The following morning, 29 February, allied and Russian representatives met near Tractir Bridge to discuss the new situation amicably. Reviews of one another’s troops were arranged to celebrate peace, and on 24 March the British commander, Codrington, invited Russian officers to a race meeting near the Tchernaya.

The Treaty of Paris, formally bringing the Crimean War to a close, was signed on 30 March, signalled by a 101-gun salute in the Crimea on 2 April and finally ratified by signatory nations on 27 April. Its provisions referred to ‘the independence and territorial integrity of the Ottoman Empire’ and the Sultan’s ‘generous intentions towards the Christian population of his empire … ameliorating their conditions without distinction of religion or race’. The Black Sea was to be neutralised, ‘in consequence [of which] His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias and His Imperial Majesty the Sultan engage not to establish or to maintain upon that coast any military–maritime arsenal’. The principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia were to enjoy ‘the privileges and immunities of which they are in possession … under the suzerainty of the Porte … without separate right of interference in their internal affairs … by any of the Guaranteeing Powers’. The principality of Servia would ‘preserve its independence and national administration, as well as full liberty of worship, of legislation, of commerce, and of navigation’.

Prince Albert commented: ‘It is not such as we could have wished; still, infinitely to be preferred to the prosecution of war.’ Queen Victoria consoled herself with the thought that England had saved Europe from ‘the arrogance and pretensions of that barbarous power, Russia’. She ‘disliked the idea of peace’, Lord Clarendon noted, but was ‘reconciled’ to it. France had no such qualms. The Crimean War was a triumph for Napoleon III, who had ‘given France a glorious victory of arms and peace to Europe’.


Further reading
Essential Histories 2: The Crimean War 1854–1856
This bitter war between Russia and Turkey, aided by Britain and France, was the setting for the stuff of legends of which the gallant Charge of the Light Brigade is probably the best remembered, This richly illustrated book covers the battles of Alma, Balaclava, Inkerman and Sebastopol, and also offers first hand soldier and civilian accounts.

Men-at-Arms 27: The Russian Army of the Crimea
This book examines the uniforms, equipment, history and organisation of the Russian Army that fought in the Crimean War. Field army, infantry, artillery and cavalry are all covered, together with details of High Command and summaries of key battles. Uniforms are shown in full illustrated detail.

Men-at-Arms 40: The British Army of the Crimea
The British Army’s involvement in the Crimean War of 1854–56 is often remembered only for the ill-advised ‘charge of the Light Brigade’ during the battle of Sevastopol as memorialized in Tennyson’s poem. Nevertheless, the British Army, together with the French and Turkish armies, posed a formidable threat to Russia’s expansionist ambitions. This book examines the uniforms of the various branches of the British Army involved in the conflict, including general officers and staff, artillery, infantry and the most colourful branch of all – the cavalry. Numerous illustrations, including rare contemporary photographs depict the army's uniforms in vivid detail.

Men-at-Arms 196: The British Army on Campaign (2) The Crimea 1854–56
In 1854 the British Army was committed to its first major war against a European power since 1815. The ‘Army of the East’ was despatched to check, in alliance with France and later Sardinia, Russian ambitions for an outlet to the Mediterranean.

Campaign 6: Balaclava 1854: The Charge of the Light BrigadeThe port of Balaclava was crucial in maintaining the supply lines for the Allied siege of Sevastapol. The Russian attack on it on 25 October 1854 therefore posed a major threat to the survival of the Allied cause. John Sweetman looks at the events, including the immortalised charge of the Light Brigade.

Campaign 51: Inkerman 1854: The Soldiers’ Battle
The third major action of the Crimean War (following Alma and Balaclava), the British victory in heavy fog at Inkerman proved to be a testament to the skill and initiative of the individual men and officers of the day: yet the Russians, although defeated, also successfully stalled a crucial allied offensive.