Tuesday, 31 October 2017

Charles Saatchi’s Great Masterpieces: Renoir and friends’ long summer in Montmartre

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/artists/charles-saatchis-great-masterpieces-renoir-andfriends-longsummer/




Pierre-Auguste Renoir grew up near the Louvre, and liked to religiously study the masters. He had begun painting by the time he was 13, working at a porcelain factory creating flower designs. Many believe that throughout his artistic career he used only five colours in his palette, and that his youth spent painting ceramics taught him how to combine these hues successfully.
In 1860, Renoir was to join a studio and meet fellow artists Claude Monet and Alfred Sisley; he spent much time sketching with Monet at La Grenouillère, a bathing spot on the Seine. They were both transfixed by the possibilities of painting light and water. It was to be a critical episode, as they developed a technique and colour range that would define the Impressionist movement.
Both came to the realisation that the colour of shadows was neither brown nor black, but rather an echo of the colour of surrounding objects – an effect to be known later as “diffuse reflection”. The two artists shared a virtually identical approach during this time, and continued to work together, until each of them matured towards more personal styles. 

Monday, 30 October 2017

100 Years Ago - Italy



The invasion of Italy

Our word to the people of Italy is to stand firm. After two and a half years of valiant warfare, the Italian nation is being suddenly subjected to a supreme test. In this war her fate is linked indissolubly with our own. The Allies stand together and Italy will not be left unaided.
The cause of the disaster is not yet fully explained. One correspondent at the front states that the left wing of the Second Army was assailed by a specially potent gas to which Italian troops, at any rate, were unaccustomed. The gas attack was followed by a terrific bombardment from new batteries whose existence was entirely unsuspected. The enemy had brought up and concealed these guns under cover of night. Finally, the infantry assault was delivered in drenching rain and masked by a thick mist. Troops so suddenly and fiercely tried may well have given way. The gallant Italian Army has proved its courage and devotion so often in this war that there is no stain upon its honour.
The big attack which broke the Italian line on the Isonzo was begun early on Wednesday morning. The whole operation bears marks of exclusively German inspiration, and for once the German method of massed attack carried everything before it. By Thursday morning Monte Matajur, at the head of the Natisone Valley, had been taken, and thereafter the Italians seem to have been overwhelmed. Late last night the Germans declared that their pursuit was “advancing rapidly from the mountains as far as the sea”, and they claimed to have taken 100,000 prisoners and over 700 guns.
These claims may be exaggerated, but every fresh message increases the impression of the magnitude of the disaster. On Saturday night the Germans were within ten miles of Udine, which is not only the Italian General Headquarters, but the focus of all the roads and railways east of the Tagliamento. It has often been said, and never with more truth than at this moment, that the Allied Front is one single line. The Isonzo is our front as much as the Somme and the Lys. Now that it has collapsed, we must do our best without delay to repair it. There is no need for alarm, but Italy must not share the fate of Rumania and Serbia. The issue must be faced swiftly, for every fresh telegram deepens the consciousness of Italy’s peril.

Friday, 27 October 2017

100 Years Ago - Italy

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/the-german-blow-at-italy-qvjhgsc9t


The German blow at Italy

The news from all other theatres of war is eclipsed by the reports arriving from Italy. On the Middle and Upper Isonzo the Germans and Austrians have massed huge fresh forces and have compelled the Italians to retire on a front of between 25 and 30 miles. The enemy claim to have taken 30,000 prisoners and more than 300 guns. The dispatches we publish today contain grave warnings. The Germans have not hitherto taken part in the operations on the Italian front, but they have now formed a 14th Army for this special purpose, and have placed in it “a number of good divisions of the Active Army”. The correspondents on the lsonzo say that the enemy seem to have transferred “the whole of their Russian front here”, and though the statement need not be taken literally, it is clear that the inactivity of the Russian Army is the true cause of the Austro-German advance. We are told that the enemy aim at far more than the recovery of the ground won from Austria on the Isonzo. They intend to invade the Italian plains, and already they claim to be across the Italian frontier “at many points”.
The reasons which have led the Germans to launch this swift blow are presumably both military and political. The military possibilities are obvious. The political reasons are twofold, and relate both to Italy and to Austria. The Austrian Army on the Italian front has never been under direct German control, and Germany may have had reasons to think a continuance of its autonomy undesirable. The civil population in Austria is dispirited, and the internal economic conditions are bad. Should Germany gain military successes on the Isonzo, as she is doing, she may be able to revive the moral of the Austrian Army and the spirits of the people of Vienna and Budapest.
The immediate military possibilities of the Austro-German offensive are of a character which Allies must instantly take into account. The weight of the thrust against General Cadorna is heavy, but he is stanch of heart and deft of hand. He met and countered in the Trentino last year a peril which, at first, seemed almost equally menacing. It must be said though that an extensive invasion of Italy at this juncture would affect the whole Allied cause. In that spirit measures must be taken should the need arise.

Thursday, 26 October 2017

100 Years Ago - Palestine

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/the-jews-and-palestine-z67ntq93m


The Jews and Palestine

The direct appeal recently made by more than 250 Jewish institutions, communities, and organizations throughout the country to His Majesty’s Government “in favour of the reconstitution of Palestine as the National Home of the Jewish people” is too significant not to merit earnest attention. It would scarcely have been made had there not been reason to believe the Government disposed to respond to it. It is, indeed, no secret that the question of re-establishing the Jews in Palestine has for months been under consideration by the British and Allied Governments, and not by them alone. But with a British Army actually in Palestine, it is naturally to Great Britain that the Jews look for a directly helping hand in the achievement of their age-long aspiration.
Yet a public announcement of our policy in this matter has been unaccountably delayed. Do our statesmen fail to see how valuable to the Allied cause would be the hearty sympathy of the Jews throughout the world which an unequivocal declaration of British policy might win? Germany has been quick to perceive the danger to her schemes and to her propaganda that would be involved in the association of the Allies with Jewish national hopes, and she has not been idle in attempting to forestall us. Have our Government, for instance, considered the value of Jewish influence in counteracting the insidious German propaganda in Russia, to which Lord Robert Cecil yesterday alluded?
On two grounds alone — were they valid — could there be any serious objection to the course which the overwhelming majority of British Jews urge the Government to take: if the colonization and development of Palestine by the Jews were impracticable, or if the Jewish people themselves were averse from the reconstitution of their national home. But neither of these objections stands the test of fact. In recent years Jewish colonies have achieved remarkable results in Palestine; and the present attitude of British Jewry may be taken as indicating that of the Jewish masses.
Further delay on the part of our Government to deal frankly with this important matter would therefore be as inexplicable as its consequences might be dangerous.

100 Years Ago - Food Rationing


A BUTTER QUEUE AT TONYPANDY IN ·THE WINTER OF 1917




POTATOES IN PLACE OF FLOUR.


Mrs. Weigall gives a demonstration of the uses of the potato as a flour substitute





ETON BOYS AT WORK IN THE POTATO FIELD


Eton boys on rations

The proprietors of the tuck-shops in Eton have been asked not to serve the boys cakes, biscuits, rolls, and scones

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

602 Years Ago


Wallace Collection влаштувала невеличку виставку з нагоди 600-ліття перемоги під Азенкуром. Зовсім-зовсім невелику - але ж три зали зброї нікуди не ділися, і можна "добрати" в них (Нарешті побачив сагайдак до куші, із болтами, кінець 15 ст., який чомусь не виставлено у сталій експозиції)



Agincourt 1415


http://nuk-tnl-deck-prod-static.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/projects/a597e50502f5ff68e3e25b9114205d4a.html Battle of Agincourt, 1415, from the 'St. Alban's Chronicle' (vellum) Battle of Agincourt, 1415, from the 'St. Alban's Chronicle' (vellum)
The battle of Agincourt (Azincourt was and remains the French spelling) was one of the most remarkable events of medieval Europe, a battle whose reputation far outranked its importance. In the long history of Anglo-French rivalry only Hastings, Waterloo, Trafalgar and Crécy share Agincourt’s renown.
Agincourt’s fame could just be an accident, a quirk of history reinforced by Shakespeare’s genius, but the evidence suggests it really was a battle that sent a shock wave through Europe. For years afterwards the French called 25 October 1415 la malheureuse journée (the unfortunate day). It had been a disaster.
Yet it was so nearly a disaster for Henry V and his small, but well-equipped army. That army had sailed from Southampton Water with high hopes, the chief of which was the swift capture of Harfleur, which would be followed by a foray into the French heartland in hope, presumably, of bringing the French to battle. A victory in that battle would demonstrate, at least in the pious Henry’s mind, God’s support of his claim to the French throne, and might even propel him onto that throne. Such hopes were not vain when his army was intact, but the siege of Harfleur took much longer than expected and Henry’s army was almost ruined by dysentery.
Extract from Campaign 9: Agincourt 1415 by Matthew Bennett
Once in position the archers began to shoot at the enemy. Just imagine for a moment that you are an archer in the English army. You are famished, cold and wet and suffering from diarrhoea or worse from the effects of your diet of unclean water and nuts and berries. You expect to die in the forthcoming battle. For the men-at-arms there will be ransoms and often cosy  captivity at the hands of men of their own class, related by birth or known to them personally. As a despised and feared footman, all you can expect is to be slaughtered by men so well-armoured as to be almost invulnerable or, if captured, to be mutilated so that you may not ply your craft again. The King has just reminded you that you can expect to lose three fingers from your right hand. However rousing his speech, you are most fortified by despair. At first it seems impossible that the French can be beaten. Then as you advance it becomes apparent that they have been careless – that they do not know what they are doing!

English Crossbowmen, Archers and Infantrymen Illustration taken from Men-at-Arms 85: Armies of Agincourt by Christopher Rothero
The English archery seems to have stirred the French to action. First their crossbowmen loosed off a hasty volley, then fell back for fear of the English arrows. Then their two wings of cavalry launched a charge across the intervening ground.

Tuesday, 24 October 2017

Charles Saatchi's Great Masterpieces: Botticelli's luxurious garden is still debated today

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/artists/charles-saatchis-great-masterpieces-botticellis-luxurious-garden/



Alessandro di Mariano di Vanni Filipepi was better known as Sandro Botticelli, courtesy of his elder brother Giovanni’s exceptionally ample girth. Giovanni was fondly called botticello – big barrel – and Sandro was quickly referred to as botticelli – little barrel.
Barrel minor was born in Florence in 1445, the youngest of four boys to survive into adulthood. He was recorded as being rather intelligent, with a sharp wit, but tended to be easily bored at school. Botticelli was restless, impatient and hyperactive, and he had withdrawn from education by the time he was 14. He managed to gain an apprenticeship as a goldsmith, before being fortunate enough to land a position at the studio of a leading Florentine painter, the brilliant Filippo Lippi. This training enabled Botticelli to make paintings that avoided technical shortcuts, and they have survived in good condition over the centuries.
Botticelli quickly developed his own distinctive style of bold outlines, intricate detail and a two-dimensionality for which he was soon to be well regarded. His apprenticeship with Lippi enabled Botticelli to make excellent contacts, and the very start of his career in art saw him creating frescoes for Florentine churches and cathedrals. His master was regularly commissioned by some of the leading patrons in Florence, and through him Botticelli met the Medici family, the most powerful in the country. As the culture in Florence became increasingly informed by religion in the late 15th century, Botticelli adapted his style to follow. He was to spend almost his entire career working on Medici commissions, and created some of his most ambitious works for them, including Primavera.
Botticelli’s reputation went from strength to strength following his connection with the Medicis, to the extent that he was summoned by the Pope to help work on the Sistine Chapel. Although Michelangelo would come to hold the honour of having painted the Sistine Chapel ceiling, Botticelli was entrusted with a key “Story of Jesus” for the chapel wall, Temptation of Christ.
Primavera, or the Allegory of Spring, is one of the most universally admired paintings in Western art, and one that has inspired more analysis than almost any other. It depicts the progress of spring, from right to left. The wind blows on the land and flowers bloom, watched over by Venus, the deity of April. Mercury, the protector of the garden, is seen to the left chasing away the last clouds before summer. Botticelli filled the garden with no fewer than 500 plant species, including a luxuriant display of over 190 different flowers.

Monday, 23 October 2017

This Week in History 75 Years Ago - El Alamein (23 October-3 November)

https://ospreypublishing.com/thisweekhistory/


Following the First Battle of El Alamein, which had stalled the Axis advance, General Bernard Montgomery took command of the British Commonwealth’s Eighth Army in August 1942. The Second Battle of El Alamein marked a significant turning point in the Western Desert Campaign of World War II. The battle lasted from 23 October to 3 November 1942, and began with the major offensive Operation Lightfoot.

With Operation Lightfoot, Montgomery hoped to carve two corridors through the Axis minefields in the north. Allied armour would then pass through the Axis defences and defeat Rommel’s German armoured divisions. Diversionary attacks in the south would keep the rest of the Axis forces from moving northwards.

Success in the battle turned the tide in the North African Campaign. Allied victory at El Alamein ended German hopes of occupying Egypt, controlling access to the Suez Canal, and gaining access to the Middle Eastern oil fields.

Thursday, 19 October 2017

THE TIMES HISTORY OF THE WAR - CHAPTER CCXIX

RUSSIA, AUGUST-NOVEMBER, 1917.





KERENSKY AND LENIN


 

REVOLUTION IN PETROGRAD: GUARDING THE TELEPHONE OFFICE




THE WOMEN'S "BATTALION OF DEATH" PARADED AT THE WINTER PALACE


Which they defended for the Provisional Government against the Bolshevists





TROTSKY ADDRESSING A CROWD IN PETROGRAD DURING A POPULAiR

DEMONSTRATION




THE SMOLNY INSTITUTE, PETROGRAD, '- HEADQUARTERS OF THE BOLSHEVISTS.

Guarded_ by Red Guards and Militia-Police


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/exploiting-the-revolution-7m5c5lfst?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=newsletter_118&utm_medium=email&utm_content=118_October%2018,%202017&CMP=TNLEmail_118918_2407360_118


Exploiting the Revolution

Even the Cossacks, who in 1905 had ruthlessly put down an incipient Revolution, were on the side of the working men. Who, indeed, could remain callous to their grievances?


By Our Petrograd Correspondent. We publish this morning the second of a series of articles from our Petrograd Correspondent, who has just reached this Country from Russia, bringing the latest news of the recent crisis.
It was a cry for “more bread” that started the Revolution. The Petrograd working men had grown tired of going dinnerless while their wives and children waited the whole day in the bitter cold, forming long, interminable queues at the provision shops. High war wages could not still hunger; the gramophones, pianos, and other unwonted luxuries that graced their homes, the expensive hats and clothes that bedecked their womenfolk, could not blind them to the fact that food was being withheld from them through culpable inefficiency on the part of the Government.
Everybody knew that there was food in abundance in the country. The newspapers did not attempt to conceal the fact. Three successive harvests had left enormous residues of grain, which formerly provided the staple of Russia’s export trade. it is true that the peasants had consumed more bread since the Edict on Temperance, but in the past this additional loaf had in reality been consumed by them in the form of vodka.
The angry working men found ready sympathizers among the troops in Petrograd. Many of the soldiers enrolled in the reserve regiments and battalions quartered in the metropolis had issued from the working class. Moreover, their rations had been reduced. Even the Cossacks, who in 1905 had ruthlessly put down an incipient Revolution, were on the side of the working men. Who, indeed, could remain callous to their grievances? Yet, however well founded the resentment of the poorer classes may have been - and it must be remembered that the severities of the Petrograd winter, coupled with greatly increased prices and scarcity of fuel, aggravated an unnecessary situation - there is good reason to believe that outside influences, the German propaganda, coupled with revolutionary ferment, had much to do with the sudden outbreak of bread riots in the early days of March.
It may be noted that the disappearance of the old regime has not led to any improvement in the food crisis; on the contrary, it has become more acute. In this food question, as in all other State problems, the Russian Revolution did not differ from other national cataclysms.

FEEDING HUGE ARMIES.
In common fairness it should be stated that the food problem imposed upon the bureaucracy was enormously enlarged during the half-year preceding the Revolution. Loyally responding to her duty as our Ally, Russia had called out huge numbers of men. The figure, if it could be stated here, would astonish us, accustomed though we have become to think in millions. All this host, distributed among the towns and cities of the Empire, had to be fed, clothed, housed, and warned. The collection, transport, and distribution of food, already so complicated by the inrush of over ten millions of refugees from the western border, taxed the central and local administrations to breaking point.
That the bureaucracy would fail was to be expected; that it managed to hold out so long is marvellous - especially when we remember that the Okhrana was there, constantly interfering with any sound, statesmanlike effort to deal with the crisis in the only way that could assure success - with the help of the people, in the closest touch and harmony with the farmers. Had the bureaucracy enjoyed freedom of action; had such capable, experienced statesmen as Krivoshein, holding a great record in rural legislation, enjoying the confidence of the Zemstvos (County Councils), been placed in full control, Russia might have weathered all the other ills of Okhranadom.
But Krivoshein had lost Imperial favour. Like other efficient administrators, he had left office, to make room for adventurers of the type of Khvostoff, Stuermer, or Protopopoff. Half-measures vere the order of the day. The menial task of collecting foodstuffs was entrusted to local government bodies. The war had necessitated some concessions. Zemstvos and municipal councils were permitted to form unions (soyuzy) to help the Government in all kinds of war work. The Okhrana saw therein a deadly peril for the autocracy. Every impediment was raised, funds were doled out meagrely, public cooperation was tolerated on the condition that things should return to their former state immediately the war was over. Instead of frank cooperation between the Government and the people, which would have mitigated the evils of war and strengthened the country, the war intensified the curse of disunion where it might have proved a blessing in disguise.
When the bread riots began in Petrograd the Government resorted to the usual bureaucratic expedient: it announced the formation of a special committee, promising to take immediate measures. But nobody had the slightest faith in this discredited method of solving a difficulty. The soldiers and the Cossacks being largely unreliable, Protopopoff, foreseeing a crisis, had organized the police into machine-gun companies, to be posted on public edifices in case of an emergency. The narrative of events that occurred during the great days of the Revolution is too well known to require recapitulation. Soldiers sacked the arsenal, and distributed arms to the working men. There was sporadic fighting between the disorganized troops; armed mobs were firing in all directions; the amateur police gunners played their weapons indiscriminately and mostly without effect. There was a colossal expenditure of ammunition and very little loss of life, not more than 200 people killed. And amid the din and confusion the old regime disappeared almost without a struggle.
BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER.
The popular desire to be rid of the Okhrana had been satisfied. The Okhrana had ceased to exist. Together with the army of spies and the gendarmerie, the ordinary police had also disappeared. Protopopoff had made them impossible when he converted them into amateur gunners. All the sober-minded elements looked for guidance to the Duma, which had made itself the spokesman of the nation in demanding reforms. President Rodzianko hoped till the last that the Tsar would give way; he waited too long. The revolutionary outbreak gave almost immediate predominance to demagogues of extremist views.
Amid the turmoil and confusion one regiment, the Preobrajensky Guards, rallied to the support of the Duma. This encouraged Rodzianko to form a Provisional Government. For this purpose a committee representing all parties in the Duma was elected. But already a rival organization known as the Council (Soviet) of Workmen’s and Soldiers’ Delegates had arisen. The Socialist leaders Tchkheidze and Tsereteli, one a Georgian serf who had become a lawyer, the other a Georgian noble, and Kerensky, then an inconspicuous lawyer, were outwardly in control of the Soviet; behind them loomed an anonymous array of extremists.
None of these men were either workmen or soldiers. (When a peasants’ Soviet was afterwards formed, the directing spirits were also found to be non- peasants.) The Soviet did not object to the formation of a Provisional Government by the Duma. M Tchkheidze preferred, indeed, that the non-Socialists should assume all the responsibility, while the Soviet wielded all the Power. M Kerensky alone entered the Ministry. Such were the circumstances in which the Lvoff-Guchkoff-Milinkoff-Kerensky Coalition came into existence, and such they have remained throughout the numerous Ministerial combinations that have followed.
Meanwhile, the Tsar had been forced to abdicate in favour of his brother, and Kerensky had compelled the Grand Duke Michael to waive his rights. The autocracy, discredited by the Okhrana and by the Rasputin scandal, left few to regret it. The Provisional Government, dominated by the Soviet, tried to accomplish a hopeless task. Mob rule asserted itself in every direction. The workmen wanted enormous pay and little work; the troops in the rear were enjoying themselves, plundering, idling, talking politics, undesirous above all of going to the front; the peasants, surfeited with money saved during their enforced sobriety, were looking forward to a general division of landed property, and looting when so inclined. The Soviet maintained and consolidated its power by constant appeal to the instincts of the masses. Programmes of universal spoliation issued from its representatives in a steady stream.
DISORGANIZING THE WAR
From the Soviet also came the notorious Prikaz No. 1 (order of the day) to the troops enjoining upon them as free men to render no respect or obedience to their officers. This prikaz converted the Russian Army into an undisciplined mob. It was intended to do so. What cared the dreamers in the Soviet or the bolshevik agents of Germany who controlled Russian affairs for obligations of national honour or the interests of the State? They were too intent upon applying Socialistic theories in practice or in making a good thing out of the Revolution. They began by sending a wireless message appealing to their German brothers to lay down their arms; they then incited the Russian soldiers to fraternize with the enemy.
These schemes failing to attain their object, they next invented the theory of “no annexation, no indemnity,” hoping thereby to impress upon the Army the belief that there was nothing to fight about, and, lastly, they discovered a panacea for all ills in a great international Socialist Conference. When the police had been removed, the local demagogues assumed control. All forms of authority - the Zemstvos, the Law Courts, the governors, &c. - were superseded by committees, owning nominal allegiance to the Soviet, but refractory to the Provisional Government.
These innumerable committees were composed of workmen, peasants, petty lawyers, partly sincere enthusiasts, partly rogues. They drew self-appointed salaries from the local Treasury or levied contributions from the propertied class, which was studiously excluded from any share in this mock administration.
The Soviet in Petrograd appropriated over 700,000 roubles a month for salaries to its members. Practically no revenue entered the coffers of the State; such revenue as could be collected was absorbed by the local Soviet or committee. The committees were not satisfied with plunder; they hampered rural labour, forbidding the peasants to work except for prohibitive wages. Having done their utmost to terrorize the landowner, they made it impossible for the stoutest-hearted farmer to continue his loyal task of producing bread. It has come to pass that, the Exchequer being empty, Russia is printing 50,000,000 roubles of paper money daily to pay her way and that the printing press is not able to keep up with the demand for notes, owing to a constant depreciation in their value.
The committee system has been most disastrous in its effect upon industries. Workmen are too busy with politics to attend to their duties. Locomotives and rolling stock are not repaired. The complete paralysis of transport, the stoppage of all industries, owing to the shortage of fuel and raw materials, is a question of months or weeks, perhaps days. The output of munitions has declined by 80 per cent. All these facts and figures were brought out at the Moscow Conference. They do not constitute a State secret. In the Army the committee system has been attended by a sweeping decline in fighting value.
The food problem, upon which the autocracy came to grief, has been equally mismanaged under the Revolutionary regime. It has involved a colossal expenditure of something like 700,000,000 roubles in the organization of local food committees, mostly composed of people who had not the remotest. connexion with the business, but were merely revolutionaries. This organization has entirely failed in its purpose. It has not induced the peasant to sell his grain, nor has it assured a fair and just distribution of foodstuffs. FaIling into the hands of theorists or self-seekers, the Russian Revolution went far beyond the desires of the nation, and under their inexperienced or culpable guidance has assumed forms that are alien to the character or the development of the Russian people.


100 Years Ago - Russia

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/russian-warships-trapped-2cf6ljdjh


Russian warships trapped

The latest news of the German enterprise in the Eastern Baltic indicates its complete success. The occupation of Oesel Island has been effected, apparently without great loss. The Russian naval forces were too few and too weak to withstand the German squadrons. With the fall of the coastal batteries on the Sverbe Peninsula the passage of the Irben Channel was forced. The heavier German ships were then able to enter the Gulf of Riga.
Considering the relative strength of the opposed forces, the result must have been a foregone conclusion. The heavy guns in the German Dreadnoughts would outrange and overpower the armaments of the older Russian vessels. The Slava, which has already figured in several engagements in the Gulf, was sunk after a gallant stand against the superior enemy. That two other large Russian vessels should have escaped was due to their retirement into the Moon Sound, but even there they may not find safety.
It is probable that the Russian minefields will, for a little time, offer an impediment to the German ships. When, however, these obstructions are swept away, it is unlikely to be long before all the islands are taken.
It is clear that the failure of the Baltic Fleet to put in an appearance when the strength of the German force became known in Petrograd was the primary cause of the loss of the islands. A couple of old battleships, with the assistance of a flotilla of destroyers and gunboats, could not be expected, even with a display of the most stubborn courage, to withstand the formidable squadrons to which they were opposed. That this little division of the Russian Fleet sacrificed itself in an attempt to delay the enemy is a high tribute to its gallantry and patriotism. That it was not reinforced from the fleet in the Gulf of Finland was due, it must be supposed, to the loss of discipline brought about by the Revolution.
The stirring appeal of M Kerensky to the fleet appears to have been of little avail. The mastery of the Gulf of Riga lays open to German enterprise the whole of Esthonia’s eastern shores. If anything like a normal condition of efficiency can be restored to the Baltic Fleet, it may yet be capable of offering opposition to the advance of the Germans in the Gulf of Finland.

Wednesday, 18 October 2017

Charles Saatchi's Great Masterpieces: how Degas accidentally ruined his friends' reputations

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/artists/charles-saatchis-great-masterpieces-degas-accidentally-ruined/


A woman slumped in her café seat, staring listlessly into space, her shoulders hunched and eyes glazed over, a glass of absinthe perched before her. She is dressed as a prostitute; the bar probably located close to Notre Dame de Paris, generally regarded as a popular haunt for women of the night, as well as artists, poets and writers. The man accompanying her is dressed shabbily, his eyes tired and empty.
The presence of the absinthe is central. It deliberately connects the drink, which was a stalwart of bohemian life at the time, to its role in society.
The painting, created in 1876, was entirely staged. Degas produced it in his studio; the man and woman were the artist’s friends. Sadly, after the painting was seen, his model, Ellen Andrée, was publicly perceived as a whore, his friend, Desboutin, as a destitute vagabond – reported by critics as a “man and a woman of the most degraded type”.
Degas wanted to set the record straight about the painting’s subjects. Desboutin, in fact, led a charmed and lavish lifestyle, owning large properties in Nice, as a result of his success as a printmaker and painter. Andrée trained to become a teacher, yet abandoned this in pursuit of her passion for the theatre and modelling. She periodically posed for Renoir and, most famously, for Manet, in his magnificent 1874 work La Parisienne.



'La Parisienne' by Édouard Manet: Ellen Andrée modelled for the painting 
 

Monday, 16 October 2017

100 Years Ago



Fictions spread by picture cards

The documents we find on prisoners always include a lot of letters and picture postcards, some of the latter showing the efforts made to keep up the spirits of the German people and to impress neutrals. One popular card is intended to demonstrate the abundance of food in Germany. It shows a young man in civilian costume, who looks like a cinema actor, seated alone at a table loaded with dainties, especially sausages and butter, while he cuts a huge slice from a large fat ham at his elbow. Whatever the effect of this picture may be on neutrals, it must be tantalizing to the troops at the front, for we learn that among the new drafts there are a great number of cases of hunger typhus. It must be rather hard on a hungry man in the trenches to have sent him this picture of an unappetizing-looking civilian of the third-class dandy type, surrounded by all the things, fat and greasy, that the German soul loves.
Another series extols the feats of the German Navy bombarding the English coasts. One picture shows a German battleship with, a mile or two away, the cliffs of Dover all wreathed in smoke. There is lovely sunshine and peaceful seas, and no sign of a British ship or a British shell. As efforts of imagination they are superb.
German soldiers also still carry with them considerable quantities of manuals instructing them how to behave when they have got to captured England and have the people at their mercy. Both the spelling and the English idiom are peculiar, but the instructions are exhaustive for every emergency. They tell the soldier how to insist on having his trousers mended immediately, and how to tell the Mayor that he is being taken as a hostage for the good behaviour of his people. They tell the conquering soldier how to make the village blacksmith shoe his horse and how to requisition the same village for “900 sausages” or to impose a fine of “Five Hundred Pounds sterling” on any place whose inhabitants are detected hiding food. One can hardly suppose the German soldiers now expect to use these manuals in England, and the only reasonable supposition is that they carry them in the hope that they will be useful when surrendering. But what a blow to Germany’s hopes that they should come to be put to such a use.

100 Years Ago - VCs


SKIPPER JOSEPH WATT




RECIPIENTS OF THE VICTORIA CROSS IN lHE COURTYARD OF BUCKINGHAM PALACE, SEPTEMBER 26, 1917,

Photographed as the King departed. The men are wearing their crosses.


Left to right: Mrs. Ackroyd, 'Lieutenant InsalI, R.F.C., Sergeant Bye, Sergeant Cooper. Sergeant Edwards (Seaforths), Sergeant Rees, Private Edwards (K.O.Y.L.I.),




Private Ratcliffe. Company Sergeant-Major Skinner.

SERGEANT (Acting C.S.M.) JOHN SKINNER, King's Own Scottish Borderers, receives his Cross






BRIGADIER-GENERAL CLIFFORD COFFIN LEAVING BUCKINGHAM PALACE AFTER RECEIVING THE VICTORIA CROSS


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/public-investiture-by-the-king-383snvz5s?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=newsletter_118&utm_medium=email&utm_content=118_October%2011,%202017&CMP=TNLEmail_118918_2378421_118


Public investiture by the King

When the widow and little son of Captain Harold Ackroyd, RAMC, were presented to his Majesty, the cheers of the spectators were loud and prolonged

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

Charles Saatchi's Great Masterpieces: how the sinner Caravaggio brought Saint Matthew to life

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/art/artists/charles-saatchis-great-masterpieces-sinner-caravaggio-broughtsaint/



Detail of The Calling of St. Matthew by Caravaggio

Orphaned at 11, Caravaggio joined a group of artists who lived by the motto nec spe, nec metu – without hope, without fear. By the time he was 13, he knew he wanted to devote his life to painting.
Starting as an apprentice in Milan, he later decided his career could flourish more quickly in Rome. These were hard years for Caravaggio, jumping from one job to the next to support himself – until finally he was taken on by an art dealer, and was able to sell some of his paintings.
As his fortunes changed, his work caught the eye of Cardinal Francesco del Monte, a highly influential bishop within the Vatican, who quickly took Caravaggio under his wing. He was even able to secure permanent accommodation and a stipend in the cardinal’s home.
Christ’s gesture for Matthew to follow him is so powerful that it suspends reaction
Caravaggio was known to work quickly and efficiently – he would often start and complete a picture in just two weeks. However, his paintings were often considered offensive, and were rejected by some of his clients, which hurt and angered him.
Fortunately, Caravaggio received a commission that would finally establish his status as a respected painter among the more important patrons. He was trusted with the task of decorating the Contarelli Chapel within the church of San Luigi dei Francesi in Rome. The assignment consisted of producing three large paintings of scenes from Saint Matthew’s life. The first of the trio to be completed, The Calling of Saint Matthew, depicts the story of Jesus and Peter seeing Matthew for the first time and asking him to join them.

Thursday, 5 October 2017

100 Years Ago - The Army Medical Service and the New Medicine

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/open-air-cure-for-soldiers-9rrtkkd9h?utm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=newsletter_118&utm_medium=email&utm_content=118_October%2004,%202017&CMP=TNLEmail_118918_2349394_118



THE DOCTOR WRITES A LETTER FOR A WOUNDED MAN





OPEN-AIR TREATMENT AT ST. THOMAS'S HOSPITAL




OUTSIDE AN ADVANCED DRESSING STATION
A ' WARD ,IN ENDELL STREET HOSPITAL.

" 'This 'hospital was' staffed -entirely bywomen

The Royal Air Force prepares for take-off - Allan Mallinson


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/past-six-days/2017-09-30/register/the-royal-air-force-prepares-for-take-off-v36snvwn5


The clamour for reprisals against German cities after heavy bombing raids over Britain meant that the creation of a separate air force made political and military sense


A British Handley Page 0/100, a four-seater heavy bomber, capable of carrying 2,000lb of bombs, with an SE 5 in the backgroundA British Handley Page 0/100, a four-seater heavy bomber, capable of carrying 2,000lb of bombs, with an SE 5 in the background

100 Years Ago

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/register/a-country-seat-for-prime-ministers-pgs75shkz


A country seat for prime ministers

A highly interesting and important gift to the nation is announced today by which the estate of Chequers, situated in one of the choicest parts of the Chilterns, will become the official country residence of the future Prime Ministers of England. It has been decided by the present owners of Chequers, Sir Arthur and Lady Lee, to transfer the estate forthwith in trust to the nation to be used and maintained, after their deaths, in perpetuity for the Prime Minister in his official capacity. Mr Lloyd George has accepted the gift in the name of his successors.
In a memorandum setting forth the object of the gift Sir Arthur Lee speaks of Chequers as an inspiring residence for its intended occupants “in their strenuous and responsible labours”. A sufficient endowment is provided to cover a permanent nucleus staff of servants, as well as a residential allowance for the official occupant. A board of ex officio trustees is constituted, consisting of the Prime Minister, the Speaker, the Foreign Secretary, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the President of the Board of Agriculture, the First Commissioner of Works, the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the National Trust, and the Director of the National Gallery. The idea of the donors is to make the estate in every way attractive as a country seat. A sufficient sum will be allotted from the trust fund to maintain the gardens and grounds, and provision is made for the maintenance of the farms as a model or experimental farm. The contents of the house go with it. They comprise a well-known collection of Cromwellian portraits and relics; a library of valuable books, chiefly of the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, and mostly in their original bindings; a collection of pictures by various masters, and papers and manuscripts of historical interest, British and foreign.
Chequers has a long and unbroken history and many Parliamentary associations. It derives its name from the title of the Keeper of the King’s Exchequer under Henry I and the mansion, which has been carefully restored by the donors, is partly of Tudor and partly of Elizabethan origin. It was for years the home of descendants in the female line of Oliver Cromwell. It lies high, its situation is salubrious, and it is less than 40 miles from Downing Street.


Tuesday, 3 October 2017

Charles Saatchi's Great Masterpieces: Berlin's bohemians and degenerative art


B erlin in the roaring Twenties, and painter Otto Dix chases writer Sylvia von Harden down the street, proclaiming: “I must paint you! I simply must! You are representative of an entire epoch!”
Von Harden, surprised, coolly responds: “So, you want to paint my lacklustre eyes, my ornate ears, my long nose, my thin lips; you want to paint my long hands, my short legs, my big feet – things which can only scare people off and delight no one?”
Sylvia von Harden was, other than caustic in her self-evaluation, a journalist, short-story writer and poet who particularly represented the avant-garde Neue Frau – a new woman in Weimar Germany. She was 32 years old at the time.
Dix pictured her in the Romanisches Café in Berlin. This daringly bohemian hangout for writers, artists, models and intellectuals was considered by more respectable citizens to be the “headquarters of the world revolution”. Dix happily spent much of his time there.
Von Harden is, clearly, a woman of striking tastes; with a pink cocktail matching pink-tipped cigarettes and large ring with a pink stone, she seems to be gesturing as if bored by the dull conversation. The neue frau is not typically feminine, and von Harden rebels by wearing her hair in a daringly close-cropped Bubikopf, or bob.


Portrait of the journalist Sylvia von Harden